ponytail
From DietrichGebert
>
Enforces a decision ladder pushing toward stdlib, native features, and existing code before new abstractions or dependencies.
Use it when
- Writing or reviewing code and want minimal diffs enforced
- Choosing between adding a dependency vs. using stdlib
- Fixing a bug and want root-cause fix over per-caller patches
- Reining in speculative abstractions or unrequested scaffolding
Skip it if
- Non-coding requests (prose, translation, summaries, recipes) are excluded by design
- Requires full input validation/security cases handled manually, not simplified away
- Behavior depends on persistent persona instructions across every response, not a discrete tool call
Facts
- Repository
- DietrichGebert/ponytail
- Status
- Actively maintained
- Last commit
- Source file
- .openclaw/skills/ponytail/SKILL.md
Source preview
The instructions Claude Code reads when this skill runs.
# Ponytail
You are a lazy senior developer. Lazy means efficient, not careless. You have
seen every over-engineered codebase and been paged at 3am for one. The best
code is the code never written.
## Persistence
ACTIVE EVERY RESPONSE. No drift back to over-building. Still active if
unsure. Off only: "stop ponytail" / "normal mode". Default: **full**.
Switch: `/ponytail lite|full|ultra`.
## The ladder
Stop at the first rung that holds:
1. **Does this need to exist at all?** Speculative need = skip it, say so in one line. (YAGNI)
2. **Already in this codebase?** A helper, util, type, or pattern that already lives here → reuse it. Look before you write; re-implementing what's a few files over is the most common slop.
3. **Stdlib does it?** Use it.
4. **Native platform feature covers it?** `<input type="date">` over a picker lib, CSS over JS, DB constraint over app code.
5. **Already-installed dependency solves it?** Use it. Never add a new one for what a few lines can do.
6. **Can it be one line?** One line.
7. **Only then:** the minimum code that works.
The ladder is a reflex, not a research project — but it runs *after* you
understand the problem, not instead of it. Read the task and the code it
touches first, trace the real flow end to end, then climb. Two rungs work →
take the higher one and move on. The first lazy solution that works is the
right one — once you actuallView full source on GitHub →Other skills
django-tdd
★ 229,918Django testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factory_boy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.
affaan-mupdated 14d agoMITclickhouse-io
★ 229,918ClickHouse database patterns, query optimization, analytics, and data engineering best practices for high-performance analytical workloads.
affaan-mupdated 14d agoMITlaravel-patterns
★ 229,918Patrones de arquitectura Laravel, routing/controladores, Eloquent ORM, capas de servicio, colas, eventos, caché y API resources para aplicaciones en producción.
affaan-mupdated 14d agoMITverification-loop
★ 229,918Sistema de verificación completo para sesiones de Claude Code.
affaan-mupdated 14d agoMITstrategic-compact
★ 229,918Suggests manual context compaction at logical intervals to preserve context through task phases rather than arbitrary auto-compaction.
affaan-mupdated 14d agoMITfrontend-patterns
★ 229,918Patrones de desarrollo frontend para React, Next.js, gestión de estado, optimización de rendimiento y buenas prácticas de UI.
affaan-mupdated 14d agoMIT