benchmark-methodology
From affaan-m
>-
Scores each competitor across nine weighted dimensions using 1-5 rubrics and plots the client's strategic tension.
Use it when
- Have a tiered competitor set from competitive-platform-analysis ready to score
- Need evidence-anchored comparable scores instead of gut-feel rankings
- Client's strategic tension (two positioning axes) is already defined
- Preparing profile cards to feed into competitive-report-structure
Skip it if
- Requires a prior competitive-platform-analysis output as input, not standalone
- Needs a client positioning brief with named tension axes already established
- Workflow is a multi-step methodology, not a quick single-pass tool
Facts
- Repository
- affaan-m/ECC
- Status
- Actively maintained
- Last commit
Source preview
The instructions Claude Code reads when this skill runs.
# Benchmark Methodology
Use this skill to turn a scoped competitor set into **comparable, defensible
scores**. Each competitor is assessed on the same nine dimensions, with
explicit 1–5 rubrics, then captured in a uniform profile card. Consistency is
the point: scores are only useful if the same evidence would earn the same
number for any competitor.
## When to Activate
- A scoped, tiered competitor set from competitive-platform-analysis is ready to score.
- Need comparable, evidence-anchored scores across competitors — not gut-feel rankings.
- Client's strategic tension (the paired axes defining their target white-space) has been established.
- Preparing to produce profile cards for assembly in competitive-report-structure.
## Client positioning brief (establish first)
Before scoring, establish the client's positioning brief. It supplies:
- **Strategic tension** — the two axes (e.g., memorability × hireability) whose
intersection marks the client's target white-space. Dimension 9 is always
the client's named tension; report both poles separately, never averaged.
- **Differentiator** — what makes the client's moat. This informs which
dimensions matter most for the client's positioning argument.
- **Brand balance** — the intended mix of distinct strategic emphases. Strategic
recommendations must not break this balance without flagging it.
## Why these dimensions
View full source on GitHub →Other skills
django-tdd
★ 229,918Django testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factory_boy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.
affaan-mupdated 15d agoMITclickhouse-io
★ 229,918ClickHouse database patterns, query optimization, analytics, and data engineering best practices for high-performance analytical workloads.
affaan-mupdated 15d agoMITlaravel-patterns
★ 229,918Patrones de arquitectura Laravel, routing/controladores, Eloquent ORM, capas de servicio, colas, eventos, caché y API resources para aplicaciones en producción.
affaan-mupdated 15d agoMITverification-loop
★ 229,918Sistema de verificación completo para sesiones de Claude Code.
affaan-mupdated 15d agoMITstrategic-compact
★ 229,918Suggests manual context compaction at logical intervals to preserve context through task phases rather than arbitrary auto-compaction.
affaan-mupdated 15d agoMITfrontend-patterns
★ 229,918Patrones de desarrollo frontend para React, Next.js, gestión de estado, optimización de rendimiento y buenas prácticas de UI.
affaan-mupdated 15d agoMIT